Use the product raised to a power rule to multiply radical expressions
Use the quotient raised to a power rule to divide radical expressions
Add and subtract radical expressions
Determine when two radicals have the same index and radicand
Recognize when a radical expression can be simplified either before or after addition or subtraction
Multiply multiple term radicals
Use the distributive property to multiply multiple term radicals
Use the power of a product rule to simplify products of multiple term radicals
Rationalize a denominator containing a radical expression
Define and recognize a rational number
Rationalize denominators with one or multiple terms
When you learned how to solve linear equations, you probably learned about like terms first. We can only combine terms that are alike, otherwise the terms will lose their meaning. In this section, when you learn how to perform algebraic operations on radical expressions you will use the concept of like terms in a new way.
You will also use the distributive property, rules for exponents, and methods for multiplying binomials to perform algebraic operations on radical expressions.
11.2.1 Multiply and Divide Radical Expressions
You can do more than just simplify radical expressions. You can multiply and divide them, too. The product raised to a power rule that we discussed previously will help us find products of radical expressions. Recall the rule:
A Product Raised to a Power Rule
For any numbers a and b and any integer x: (ab)x=ax⋅bx
For any numbers a and b and any positive integer x: (ab)x1=ax1⋅bx1
For any numbers a and b and any positive integer x: xab=xa⋅xb
The Product Raised to a Power Rule is important because you can use it to multiply radical expressions. Note that you can’t multiply a square root and a cube root using this rule. The indices of the radicals must match in order to multiply them. In our first example we will work with integers, then we will move on to expressions with variable radicands.
Example 11.2.A
Simplify. 18⋅16
Answer: Use the rule xa⋅xb=xab to multiply the radicands.
18⋅16288
Look for perfect squares in the radicand, and rewrite the radicand as the product of two factors.
144⋅2
Identify perfect squares.
(12)2⋅2
Rewrite as the product of two radicals.
(12)2⋅2
Simplify, using x2=∣x∣.
∣12∣⋅212⋅2
Answer
18⋅16=122
You may have also noticed that both 18 and 16 can be written as products involving perfect square factors. How would the expression change if you simplified each radical first, before multiplying? In the next example we will use the same product from above to show that you can simplify before multiplying and get the same result.
Example 11.2.B
Simplify. 18⋅16
Answer: Look for perfect squares in each radicand, and rewrite as the product of two factors.
9⋅2⋅4⋅43⋅3⋅2⋅4⋅4
Identify perfect squares.
(3)2⋅2⋅(4)2
Rewrite as the product of radicals.
(3)2⋅2⋅(4)2
Simplify, using x2=∣x∣.
∣3∣⋅2⋅∣4∣3⋅2⋅4
Multiply.
122
Answer
18⋅16=122
In both cases, you arrive at the same product, 122. It does not matter whether you multiply the radicands or simplify each radical first.
You multiply radical expressions that contain variables in the same manner. As long as the roots of the radical expressions are the same, you can use the Product Raised to a Power Rule to multiply and simplify. Look at the two examples that follow. In both problems, the Product Raised to a Power Rule is used right away and then the expression is simplified. Note that we specify that the variable is non-negative, x≥0, thus allowing us to avoid the need for absolute value.
Example 11.2.c
Simplify. 12x4⋅3x2, x≥0
Answer: Use the rule xa⋅xb=xab to multiply the radicands.
12x4⋅3x212⋅3⋅x4⋅x2
Recall that x4⋅x2=x4+2.
36⋅x4+236⋅x6
Look for perfect squares in the radicand.
(6)2⋅(x3)2
Rewrite as the product of radicals.
(6)2⋅(x3)26⋅x3
Answer
12x4⋅3x2=6x3
Analysis of the solution
Even though our answer contained a variable with an odd exponent that was simplified from an even indexed root, we don't need to write our answer with absolute value because we specified before we simplified that x≥0. It is important to read the problem very well when you are doing math. Even the smallest statement like x≥0 can influence the way you write your answer.
In our next example we will multiply two cube roots.
Example 11.2.d
Simplify. 3x5y2⋅538x2y4
Answer: Notice that both radicals are cube roots, so you can use the rule to multiply the radicands.
Look for perfect cubes in the radicand. Since x7 is not a perfect cube, it has to be rewritten as x6+1=(x2)3⋅x.
53(2)3⋅(x2)3⋅x⋅(y2)3
Rewrite as the product of radicals.
53(2)3⋅3(x2)3⋅3(y2)3⋅3x5⋅2⋅x2⋅y2⋅3x
Answer
3x5y2⋅538x2y4=10x2y23x
In the following video we present more examples of how to multiply radical expressions.
https://youtu.be/PQs10_rFrSM
This next example is slightly more complicated because there are more than two radicals being multiplied. In this case, notice how the radicals are simplified before multiplication takes place. (Remember that the order you choose to use is up to you—you will find that sometimes it is easier to multiply before simplifying, and other times it is easier to simplify before multiplying. With some practice, you may be able to tell which is which before you approach the problem, but either order will work for all problems.)
Example 11.2.e
Simplify. 2416x9⋅4y3⋅481x3y, x≥0, y≥0
Answer: Notice this expression is multiplying three radicals with the same (fourth) root. Simplify each radical, if possible, before multiplying. Be looking for powers of 4 in each radicand.
24(2)4⋅(x2)4⋅x⋅4y3⋅4(3)4⋅x3y
Rewrite as the product of radicals.
24(2)4⋅4(x2)4⋅4x⋅4y3⋅4(3)4⋅4x3y
Identify and pull out powers of 4, using the fact that 4x4=∣x∣.
Since all the radicals are fourth roots, you can use the rule xab=xa⋅xb to multiply the radicands.
2⋅2⋅3⋅x2⋅4x⋅y3⋅x3y12x24x1+3⋅y3+1
Now that the radicands have been multiplied, look again for powers of 4, and pull them out. We can drop the absolute value signs in our final answer because at the start of the problem we were told x≥0, y≥0.
12x24x4⋅y412x24x4⋅4y412x2⋅∣x∣⋅∣y∣
Answer
2416x9⋅4y3⋅481x3y=12x3y,x≥0,y≥0
In the following video we show more examples of multiplying cube roots.
https://youtu.be/cxRXofdelIM
11.2.2 Dividing Radical Expressions
You can use the same ideas to help you figure out how to simplify and divide radical expressions. Recall that the Product Raised to a Power Rule states that xab=xa⋅xb. Well, what if you are dealing with a quotient instead of a product?
There is a rule for that, too. The Quotient Raised to a Power Rule states that (ba)x=bxax. Again, if you imagine that the exponent is a rational number, then you can make this rule applicable for roots as well: (ba)x1=bx1ax1, so xba=xbxa.
A Quotient Raised to a Power Rule
For any real numbers a and b (b ≠ 0) and any positive integer x: (ba)x1=bx1ax1
For any real numbers a and b (b ≠ 0) and any positive integer x: xba=xbxa
As you did with multiplication, you will start with some examples featuring integers before moving on to more complex expressions like 38y324xy4.
Example 11.2.f
Simplify. 2548
Answer: Use the rule xba=xbxa to create two radicals; one in the numerator and one in the denominator.
2548
Simplify each radical. Look for perfect square factors in the radicand, and rewrite the radicand as a product of factors.
2516⋅3or5⋅54⋅4⋅3
Identify and pull out perfect squares.
(5)2(4)2⋅3(5)2(4)2⋅3
Simplify.
54⋅3
Answer
2548=543
Example 11.2.g
Simplify. 340640
Answer: Rewrite using the Quotient Raised to a Power Rule.
3403640
Simplify each radical. Look for perfect cubes in the radicand, and rewrite the radicand as a product of factors.
You can simplify this expression even further by looking for common factors in the numerator and denominator.
2354310
Rewrite the numerator as a product of factors.
2352⋅235⋅32
Identify factors of 1, and simplify.
2⋅235235⋅322⋅1⋅32
Answer
340640=232
That was a lot of effort, but you were able to simplify using the Quotient Raised to a Power Rule. What if you found the quotient of this expression by dividing within the radical first, and then took the cube root of the quotient?
Let’s take another look at that problem.
Example 11.2.h
Simplify. 3403640
Answer: Since both radicals are cube roots, you can use the rule xbxa=xba to create a single rational expression underneath the radical.
340640
Within the radical, divide 640 by 40.
640÷40=16316
Look for perfect cubes in the radicand, and rewrite the radicand as a product of factors.
38⋅2
Identify perfect cubes and pull them out.
3(2)3⋅232
Simplify.
2⋅32
Answer
3403640=232
That was a more straightforward approach, wasn’t it?
In the next video we show more examples of simplifying a radical that contains a quotient.
https://youtu.be/SxImTm9GVNo
As with multiplication, the main idea here is that sometimes it makes sense to divide and then simplify, and other times it makes sense to simplify and then divide. Whichever order you choose, though, you should arrive at the same final expression.
Now let’s turn to some radical expressions containing division. Notice that the process for dividing these is the same as it is for dividing integers.
Example 11.2.i
Simplify. 10x30x,x>0
Answer: Use the Quotient Raised to a Power Rule to rewrite this expression.
10x30x
Simplify 10x30x by identifying similar factors in the numerator and denominator and then identifying factors of 1.
10x3⋅10x3⋅10x10x3⋅1
Answer
10x30x=3
Example 11.2.j
Simplify. 38y324xy4,y=0
Answer: Use the Quotient Raised to a Power Rule to rewrite this expression.
38y24xy4
Simplify 38y24xy4 by identifying similar factors in the numerator and denominator and then identifying factors of 1.
38⋅y8⋅3⋅x⋅y3⋅y313⋅x⋅y3⋅8y8y313⋅x⋅y3⋅1
Identify perfect cubes and pull them out of the radical.
33xy33(y)3⋅3x
Simplify.
3(y)3⋅33x
Answer
38y324xy4=y33x
In our last video we show more examples of simplifying radicals that contain quotients with variables.
https://youtu.be/04X-hMgb0tA
As you become more familiar with dividing and simplifying radical expressions, make sure you continue to pay attention to the roots of the radicals that you are dividing. For example, while you can think of 225y48y2 as equivalent to 225y48y2 since both the numerator and the denominator are square roots, notice that you cannot express 4225y48y2 as 4225y48y2. In this second case, the numerator is a square root and the denominator is a fourth root.
11.2.3 Add and Subtract Radical Expressions
There are two keys to combining radicals by addition or subtraction: look at the index, and look at the radicand. If these are the same, then addition and subtraction are possible. If not, then you cannot combine the two radicals. In the graphic below, the index of the expression 123xy is 3 and the radicand is xy.
Making sense of a string of radicals may be difficult. One helpful tip is to think of radicals as variables, and treat them the same way. When you add and subtract variables, you look for like terms, which is the same thing you will do when you add and subtract radicals.
In this first example, both radicals have the same radicand and index.
Example 11.2.k
Add. 311+711
Answer: The two radicals are the same, . This means you can combine them as you would combine the terms 3a+7a.
311 + 711
Answer
311+711=1011
This next example contains more addends, or terms that are being added together. Notice how you can combine like terms (radicals that have the same root and index) but you cannot combine unlike terms.
Example 11.2.l
Add. 52+3+43+22
Answer: Rearrange terms so that like radicals are next to each other. Then add.
52+22+3+43
Answer
52+3+43+22=72+53
Notice that the expression in the previous example is simplified even though it has two terms: 72 and 53. It would be a mistake to try to combine them further! (Some people make the mistake that 72+53=125. This is incorrect because2 and 3 are not like radicals so they cannot be added.)
Example 11.2.m
Add. 3x+123xy+x
Answer: Rearrange terms so that like radicals are next to each other. Then add.
3x+x+123xy
Answer
3x+123xy+x=4x+123xy
In the following video we show more examples of how to identify and add like radicals.
https://youtu.be/ihcZhgm3yBg
Sometimes you may need to add and simplify the radical. If the radicals are different, try simplifying first—you may end up being able to combine the radicals at the end, as shown in these next two examples.
Example 11.2.n
Add and simplify. 2340+3135
Answer: Simplify each radical by identifying perfect cubes.
The following video shows more examples of adding radicals that require simplification.
https://youtu.be/S3fGUeALy7E
11.2.4 Subtract Radicals
Subtraction of radicals follows the same set of rules and approaches as addition—the radicands and the indices must be the same for two (or more) radicals to be subtracted. In the three examples that follow, subtraction has been rewritten as addition of the opposite.
Example 11.2.p
Subtract. 513−313
Answer: The radicands and indices are the same, so these two radicals can be combined.
513−313
Answer
513−313=213
Example 11.2.q
Subtract. 435a−33a−235a
Answer: Two of the radicals have the same index and radicand, so they can be combined. Rewrite the expression so that like radicals are next to each other.
435a+(−33a)+(−235a)435a+(−235a)+(−33a)
Combine. Although the indices of 235a and −33a are the same, the radicands are not—so they cannot be combined.
235a+(−33a)
Answer
435a−33a−235a=235a−33a
In the following video we show more examples of subtracting radical expressions when no simplifying is required.
https://youtu.be/77TR9HsPZ6M
Example 11.2.r
Subtract and simplify. 54a5b−a416ab, where a≥0 and b≥0
Answer: Simplify each radical by identifying and pulling out powers of 4.
In our last video we show more examples of subtracting radicals that require simplifying.
https://youtu.be/6MogonN1PRQ
11.2.5 Multiple Term Radicals
When multiplying multiple term radical expressions it is important to follow the Distributive Property of Multiplication, as when you are multiplying regular, non-radical expressions.
Radicals follow the same mathematical rules that other real numbers do. So, although the expression x(3x−5) may look different than a(3a−5), you can treat them the same way.
Let’s have a look at how to apply the Distributive Property. First let’s do a problem with the variable a, and then solve the same problem replacing a with x.
Example 11.2.s
Simplify. a(3a−5)
Answer: Use the Distributive Property of Multiplication over Subtraction.
a(3a)−a(5)=3a2−5a
Answer
a(3a−5)=3a2−5a
Example 11.2.t
Simplify. x(3x−5)
Answer: Use the Distributive Property of Multiplication over Subtraction.
x(3x)−x(5)
Apply the rules of multiplying radicals: a⋅b=ab to multiply x(3x).
3x2−5x
Be sure to simplify radicals when you can: x2=∣x∣, so 3x2=3∣x∣.
Answer
x(3x−5)=3∣x∣−5x
The answers to the previous two problems should look similar to you. The only difference is that in the second problem, x has replaced the variable a (and so ∣x∣ has replaced a2). The process of multiplying is very much the same in both problems.
In these next two problems, each term contains a radical.
Example 11.2.u
Simplify. 7x(2xy+y)
Answer: Use the Distributive Property of Multiplication over Addition to multiply each term within parentheses by 7x.
7x(2xy)+7x(y)
Apply the rules of multiplying radicals.
7⋅2x2y+7xy
x2=∣x∣, so ∣x∣ can be pulled out of the radical.
14∣x∣y+7xy
Answer
7x(2xy+y)=14∣x∣y+7xy
Example 11.2.v
Simplify. 3a(23a2−43a5+83a8)
Answer: Use the Distributive Property.
3a(23a2)−3a(43a5)+3a(83a8)
Apply the rules of multiplying radicals.
23a⋅a2−43a⋅a5+83a⋅a823a3−43a6+83a9
Identify cubes in each of the radicals.
23a3−43(a2)3+83(a3)3
Answer
3a(23a2−43a5+83a8)=2a−4a2+8a3
In the following video we show more examples of how to multiply radical expressions using distribution.
https://youtu.be/hizqmgBjW0k
In all of these examples, multiplication of radicals has been shown following the pattern a⋅b=ab. Then, only after multiplying, some radicals have been simplified—like in the last problem. After you have worked with radical expressions a bit more, you may feel more comfortable identifying quantities such as x⋅x=x without going through the intermediate step of finding that x⋅x=x2. In the rest of the examples that follow, though, each step is shown.
11.2.6 Multiply Binomial Expressions That Contain Radicals
You can use the same technique for multiplying binomials to multiply binomial expressions with radicals.
As a refresher, here is the process for multiplying two binomials. If you like using the expression “FOIL” (First, Outside, Inside, Last) to help you figure out the order in which the terms should be multiplied, you can use it here, too.
The multiplication works the same way in both problems; you just have to pay attention to the index of the radical (that is, whether the roots are square roots, cube roots, etc.) when multiplying radical expressions.
Multiplying Two-Term Radical Expressions
To multiply radical expressions, use the same method as used to multiply polynomials.
Use the Distributive Property (or, if you prefer, the shortcut FOIL method);
Record the terms, and then combine like terms (if possible). Here, there are no like terms to combine.
4x23x2+8x2+x+23x
Answer
(4x2+3x)(3x2+2)=4x23x2+8x2+x+23x
In the following video we show more examples of how to multiply two binomials that contain radicals.
https://youtu.be/VUWIBk3ga5I
11.2.7 Rationalize Denominators
Although radicals follow the same rules that integers do, it is often difficult to figure out the value of an expression containing radicals. For example, you probably have a good sense of how much 84,0.75 and 96 are, but what about the quantities 21 and 51? These are much harder to visualize.
That said, sometimes you have to work with expressions that contain many radicals. Often the value of these expressions is not immediately clear. In cases where you have a fraction with a radical in the denominator, you can use a technique called rationalizing a denominator to eliminate the radical. The point of rationalizing a denominator is to make it easier to understand what the quantity really is by removing radicals from the denominators.
The idea of rationalizing a denominator makes a bit more sense if you consider the definition of “rationalize.” Recall that the numbers 5, 21, and 0.75 are all known as rational numbers—they can each be expressed as a ratio of two integers (15,21, and 43 respectively). Some radicals are irrational numbers because they cannot be represented as a ratio of two integers. As a result, the point of rationalizing a denominator is to change the expression so that the denominator becomes a rational number.
Here are some examples of irrational and rational denominators.
Irrational
Rational
21
=
22
32+3
=
323+3
Now let’s examine how to get from irrational to rational denominators.
11.2.8 Rationalizing Denominators with One Term
Let’s start with the fraction 21. Its denominator is 2, an irrational number. This makes it difficult to figure out what the value of 21 is.
You can rename this fraction without changing its value, if you multiply it by 1. In this case, set 1 equal to 22. Watch what happens.
21⋅1=21⋅22=2⋅22=42=22
The denominator of the new fraction is no longer a radical (notice, however, that the numerator is).
So why choose to multiply 21 by 22? You knew that the square root of a number times itself will be a whole number. In algebraic terms, this idea is represented by x⋅x=x. Look back to the denominators in the multiplication of 21⋅1. Do you see where 2⋅2=4=2?
In the following videos we show examples of rationalizing the denominator of a radical expression that contains integer radicands.
https://youtu.be/K7NdhPLVl7g
Here are some more examples. Notice how the value of the fraction is not changed at all—it is simply being multiplied by another name for 1.
Example 11.2.z
Rationalize the denominator.
32+3
Answer: The denominator of this fraction is 3. To make it into a rational number, multiply it by 3, since 3⋅3=3.
32+3
Multiply the entire fraction by another name for 1, 33.
32+3⋅333⋅33(2+3)
Use the Distributive Property to multiply 3(2+3).
923+3⋅3
Simplify the radicals, where possible. 9=3.
923+9
Answer
32+3=323+3
You can use the same method to rationalize denominators to simplify fractions with radicals that contain a variable. As long as you multiply the original expression by another name for 1, you can eliminate a radical in the denominator without changing the value of the expression itself.
Example 11.2.aa
Rationalize the denominator.
xx+y, where x=0
Answer: The denominator is x, so the entire expression can be multiplied by xx to get rid of the radical in the denominator.
xx+y⋅xxx⋅xx(x+y)
Use the Distributive Property. Simplify the radicals, where possible. Remember that x⋅x=x.
x⋅xx⋅x+x⋅y
Answer
xx+y=xx+xy
Example 11.2.ab
Rationalize the denominator and simplify.
11y100x, where y=0
Answer: Rewrite ba as ba.
11y100x
The denominator is 11y, so multiplying the entire expression by 11y11y will rationalize the denominator.
11y⋅11y100x⋅11y
Multiply and simplify the radicals, where possible.
11y⋅11y100⋅11xy
100 is a perfect square. Remember that100=10 and x⋅x=x.
11y⋅11y100⋅11xy
Answer
11y100x=11y1011xy
11.2.9 Rationalizing Denominators with Two Terms
Denominators do not always contain just one term, as shown in the previous examples. Sometimes, you will see expressions like 2+33 where the denominator is composed of two terms, 2 and +3.
Unfortunately, you cannot rationalize these denominators the same way you rationalize single-term denominators. If you multiply 2+3 by 2, you get 2+32. The original 2 is gone, but now the quantity 32 has appeared...this is no better!
In order to rationalize this denominator, you want to square the radical term and somehow prevent the integer term from being multiplied by a radical. Is this possible?
It is possible—and you have already seen how to do it!
Recall that when binomials of the form (a+b)(a−b) are multiplied, the product is . So, for example, (x+3)(x−3)=x2−3x+3x−9=x2−9; notice that the terms −3x and +3x combine to 0. Now for the connection to rationalizing denominators: what if you replaced x with 2?
Look at the side by side examples below. Just as −3x+3x combines to 0 on the left, −32+32 combines to 0 on the right.
(x+3)(x−3)=x2−3x+3x−9=x2−9
(2+3)(2−3)=(2)2−32+32−9=(2)2−9=2−9=−7
There you have it! Multiplying 2+3 by 2−3 removed one radical without adding another.
In this example, 2−3 is known as a conjugate, and 2+3 and 2−3 are known as a conjugate pair. To find the conjugate of a binomial that includes radicals, change the sign of the second term to its opposite as shown in the table below.
Term
Conjugate
Product
2+3
2−3
(2+3)(2−3)=(2)2−(3)2=2−9=−7
x−5
x+5
(x−5)(x+5)=(x)2−(5)2=x−25
8−2x
8+2x
(8−2x)(8+2x)=(8)2−(2x)2=64−4x
1+xy
1−xy
(1+xy)(1−xy)=(1)2−(xy)2=1−xy
Example 11.2.ac
Rationalize the denominator and simplify.
3+55−7
Answer: Find the conjugate of 3+5. Then multiply the entire expression by 3−53−5.
3+55−7⋅3−53−5(3+5)(3−5)(5−7)(3−5)
Use the Distributive Property to multiply the binomials in the numerator and denominator.
3⋅3−35+35−5⋅55⋅3−55−37+7⋅5
Since you multiplied by the conjugate of the denominator, the radical terms in the denominator will combine to 0.
9−35+35−2515−55−37+35
Simplify radicals where possible.
9−2515−55−37+359−515−55−37+35
Answer
3+55−7=415−55−37+35
Example 11.2.ad
Rationalize the denominator and simplify.
x+2x
Answer: Find the conjugate of x+2. Then multiply the numerator and denominator by x−2x−2.
x+2x⋅x−2x−2(x+2)(x−2)x(x−2)
Use the Distributive Property to multiply the binomials in the numerator and denominator.
x⋅x−2x+2x−2⋅2x⋅x−2x
Simplify. Remember that x⋅x=x. Since you multiplied by the conjugate of the denominator, the radical terms in the denominator will combine to 0.
x⋅x−2x+2x−4x⋅x−2x
Answer
x+2x=x−4x−2x
One word of caution: this method will work for binomials that include a square root, but not for binomials with roots greater than 2. This is because squaring a root that has an index greater than 2 does not remove the root, as shown below.
3100 cannot be simplified any further, since its prime factors are 2⋅2⋅5⋅5. There are no cubed numbers to pull out! Multiplying 310+5 by its conjugate does not result in a radical-free expression.
In the following video we show more examples of how to rationalize a denominator using the conjugate.
https://youtu.be/vINRIRgeKqU
Summary
The Product Raised to a Power Rule and the Quotient Raised to a Power Rule can be used to simplify radical expressions as long as the roots of the radicals are the same. The Product Rule states that the product of two or more numbers raised to a power is equal to the product of each number raised to the same power. The same is true of roots: xab=xa⋅xb. When dividing radical expressions, the rules governing quotients are similar: xba=xbxa.
Combining radicals is possible when the index and the radicand of two or more radicals are the same. Radicals with the same index and radicand are known as like radicals. It is often helpful to treat radicals just as you would treat variables: like radicals can be added and subtracted in the same way that like variables can be added and subtracted. Sometimes, you will need to simplify a radical expression before it is possible to add or subtract like terms.
To multiply radical expressions that contain more than one term, use the same method that you use to multiply polynomials. First, use the Distributive Property (or, if you prefer, the shortcut FOIL method) to multiply the terms. Then, apply the rules a⋅b=ab, and x⋅x=x to multiply and simplify. Finally, combine like terms.
When you encounter a fraction that contains a radical in the denominator, you can eliminate the radical by using a process called rationalizing the denominator. To rationalize a denominator, you need to find a quantity that, when multiplied by the denominator, will create a rational number (no radical terms) in the denominator. When the denominator contains a single term, as in 51, multiplying the fraction by 55 will remove the radical from the denominator. When the denominator contains two terms, as in5+32, identify the conjugate of the denominator, here5−3, and multiply both numerator and denominator by the conjugate.
Licenses & Attributions
CC licensed content, Original
Multiply Square Roots.Authored by: James Sousa (Mathispower4u.com) for Lumen Learning.License: CC BY: Attribution.
Multiply Cube Roots.Authored by: James Sousa (Mathispower4u.com) for Lumen Learning.License: CC BY: Attribution.
Dividing Radicals without Variables (Basic with no rationalizing).Authored by: James Sousa (Mathispower4u.com) for Lumen Learning.License: CC BY: Attribution.
Dividing Radicals with Variables (Basic with no rationalizing).Authored by: James Sousa (Mathispower4u.com) for Lumen Learning.License: CC BY: Attribution.
Revision and Adaptation.Provided by: Lumen LearningLicense: CC BY: Attribution.
Adding Radicals (Basic With No Simplifying).Authored by: James Sousa (Mathispower4u.com) for Lumen Learning.License: CC BY: Attribution.
Adding Radicals That Requires Simplifying.Authored by: James Sousa (Mathispower4u.com) for Lumen Learning.License: CC BY: Attribution.
Subtracting Radicals (Basic With No Simplifying).Authored by: James Sousa (Mathispower4u.com) for Lumen Learning.License: CC BY: Attribution.
Subtracting Radicals That Requires Simplifying.Authored by: James Sousa (Mathispower4u.com) for Lumen Learning.License: Public Domain: No Known Copyright.
Multiplying Radical Expressions with Variables Using Distribution.Authored by: James Sousa (Mathispower4u.com) for Lumen Learning.License: CC BY: Attribution.
Multiplying Binomial Radical Expressions with Variables.Authored by: James Sousa (Mathispower4u.com) for Lumen Learning.License: CC BY: Attribution.
CC licensed content, Shared previously
Unit 16: Radical Expressions and Quadratic Equations, from Developmental Math: An Open Program.Provided by: Monterey Institute of TechnologyLocated at: https://www.nroc.org/.License: CC BY: Attribution.
Precalculus.Provided by: OpenStaxAuthored by: Abramson, Jay.Located at: https://cnx.org/contents/fd53eae1-fa23-47c7-bb1b-972349835c3c@5.175:1/Preface.License: CC BY: Attribution. License terms: Dwonload fro free at : http://cnx.org/contents/fd53eae1-fa23-47c7-bb1b-972349835c3c@5.175:1/Preface.
Ex 1: Rationalize the Denominator of a Radical Expression.Authored by: James Sousa (Mathispower4u.com) .License: CC BY: Attribution.
Ex: Rationalize the Denominator of a Radical Expression - Conjugate.Authored by: James Sousa (Mathispower4u.com) .License: CC BY: Attribution.